President Donald Trump Is Finally About To Get Sweet Payback – Long-Serving RINO Senator Is OUT Of The Lead as Trump Ally...
New York City – May 28, 2026
President Trump Continues Influence Over GOP Primaries as Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy Prepares Challenge to Sen. Lisa Murkowski in 2028
New York City, New York — President Donald J. Trump has signaled continued efforts to reshape the Republican Party by supporting primary challengers against incumbents he views as insufficiently loyal, with the latest developments pointing toward a potential 2028 Senate race in Alaska.
Trump’s endorsement of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in the state’s Republican Senate primary contributed to the defeat of longtime Sen. John Cornyn, who lost his re-election bid on Tuesday night. The outcome has fueled speculation that the president’s so-called “revenge tour” against perceived disloyal Republicans could extend into future election cycles.
Over the past year, the White House has reportedly circulated an internal list of potential targets, including several GOP senators up for re-election in 2028 such as Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Rand Paul of Kentucky, and Todd Young of Indiana. Trump has already publicly criticized two House Republicans for actions he interpreted as insufficient support.
In Alaska, Gov. Mike Dunleavy is preparing to announce a 2028 U.S. Senate bid against incumbent Sen. Murkowski, according to multiple sources familiar with the discussions. Dunleavy, a strong Trump ally since 2016, would enter the race as a challenger to one of the Senate’s most moderate Republicans, who has frequently clashed with the president.
Sources close to Dunleavy described him as results-oriented and less focused on national media attention.
“He’s not about an ego and pushing himself in front of the cameras. He gets stuff done,” one Republican senator said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
“He doesn’t like the cocktail parties and photo ops.”
Nevertheless, the governor recognizes the importance of Washington influence for advancing Alaska’s interests. He was the second governor to endorse Trump in 2016 and has made frequent visits to the White House despite the significant distance from Alaska.
“Trump has talked to him before about running and wants him to run,” the source added.
Another individual close to the situation told Fox News Digital that the matchup represents a viable option.
“Obviously there are a lot of frustrations with Sen. Murkowski,” the source said. “Gov. Dunleavy has been not only a successful governor, but a strong ally for him. So it’s only natural that he’d be hearing that from Alaskans — but also from folks in the broader MAGA movement.”
Dunleavy has built a reputation for focusing on energy development, infrastructure, and rural education, earning respect across conservative and Native communities in Alaska. Observers note that his support extends beyond traditional Republican circles, which could prove significant in a statewide contest under Alaska’s ranked-choice voting system.
“Murkowski has never faced a challenger like him,” another source said. “He’s built support that goes beyond just conservatives.”
The potential race would pit Murkowski, whose family has deep roots in Alaska politics, against Dunleavy, a Trump-aligned executive with a record of delivering tangible results for the state.
Analysts suggest the developments reflect Trump’s broader goal of consolidating influence within the Republican Party as he approaches the later stages of his presidency. Whether the pattern of primary challenges continues will depend on the political landscape heading into the 2028 midterm cycle.
6-3 RULING - Supreme Court Deals Brutal Blow to Hakeem Jeffries
Washington, D.C. - June 5, 2026
Supreme Court Allows Alabama to Proceed with New Congressional Map for 2026 Midterms
The U.S. Supreme Court issued an unsigned 6-3 order on Tuesday permitting Alabama to use a newly enacted congressional district map in the 2026 midterm elections. The decision lifts a lower court injunction and is expected to result in a congressional delegation of six Republicans and one Democrat.
The ruling came after Alabama had already held its congressional primary elections in May. Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey signed legislation authorizing special elections in August for affected districts, contingent on final court approval of the map.
The order relied in part on the Purcell principle, which generally discourages federal courts from altering election rules close to an election. The majority stated that the district court had improperly intervened in Alabama’s efforts to conduct its elections under maps selected by the state’s elected representatives. The court noted that while federal courts should avoid last-minute changes, states retain authority to determine whether such adjustments serve their interests.
Connection to Voting Rights Act Precedent
The decision follows a 6-3 ruling issued by the Supreme Court on April 29 regarding the Voting Rights Act. That earlier decision established that claims alleging racial discrimination in districting generally require plaintiffs to demonstrate a strong inference of intentional discrimination before proceeding with litigation.
The current order addresses ongoing redistricting litigation in Alabama. The new map is anticipated to alter the composition of the state’s seven-member congressional delegation. Democratic Representatives Shomari Figures of the 2nd District and Terri Sewell of the 7th District are currently the only Black members of Alabama’s House delegation. The new configuration could affect representation in one of those districts.
Dissenting Opinion
The three liberal justices dissented from the unsigned order. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that the majority’s approach had created turmoil and harm. She argued that the court was doubling down on prior decisions that she viewed as undermining protections under the Voting Rights Act.
Broader Redistricting Context
The Alabama case is one of several redistricting disputes before the Supreme Court involving states such as Louisiana, Texas, Virginia, and California. With control of the U.S. House expected to be closely contested, these cases have taken on added significance for both parties ahead of the November elections.
The Supreme Court’s recent interventions have already influenced district boundaries in multiple states. Additional litigation remains pending, and further developments could continue to shape the partisan balance of the House in the upcoming midterm cycle.
The Alabama order permits the state to move forward with its chosen map while legal proceedings on related matters continue. The full impact on the composition of Alabama’s congressional delegation will depend on the outcome of the August special elections and any subsequent legal challenges.
GHOST VOTERS' REVEALED — California Elections Rocked After Stunning Discovery
Sacramento, California - June 5, 2026
Lawsuit Filed Against California Secretary of State Alleging Failure to Remove Inactive Voter Registrations
A federal lawsuit has been filed against California Secretary of State Shirley Weber alleging that the state has failed to remove hundreds of thousands of inactive voter registrations from its rolls in violation of federal law. The complaint was brought by Orange County Supervisor Don Wagner, a Republican candidate for Secretary of State, and the American Independent Party of California, with assistance from Judicial Watch.
The lawsuit claims that California has not removed approximately 873,092 inactive voter registrations as required under the National Voter Registration Act. Federal law mandates that states remove certain registrations after voters fail to participate in multiple consecutive federal election cycles and do not respond to address verification notices.
Court filings state that more than 873,000 registrations remained on the rolls despite being inactive through at least three consecutive federal elections. The complaint further alleges that over 151,000 registrations remained active after four consecutive election cycles without voter participation.
California maintains more than 23 million registered voters, the largest voter registration system in the United States. Plaintiffs argue that the state’s practices violate requirements under the National Voter Registration Act for maintaining accurate voter lists.
Previous Actions and Current Allegations
In 2019, Judicial Watch reached a settlement with California and Los Angeles County that resulted in the removal of more than 1.2 million inactive voter registrations. The current lawsuit contends that similar issues persist across much of the state despite those prior efforts.
The complaint notes that 20 California counties removed 50 or fewer inactive registrations over a recent period, even as census data showed substantial population shifts and migration out of the state.
The lawsuit seeks a court order requiring California to implement a more aggressive program for removing registrations that no longer meet federal eligibility requirements. It also asks the court to prevent future violations of federal election law.
State Response and Context
California officials have maintained that the state’s election system includes multiple safeguards, including signature matching, voter identification checks where required, and criminal penalties for fraud. State representatives have stated that the system is secure and employs verification procedures designed to prevent illegal voting.
The lawsuit was filed amid ongoing scrutiny of California’s election processes. Recent incidents include damage to a mail ballot drop box that was vandalized and set on fire, as well as a report of an unsecured ballot center in the Bay Area discovered by a voter outside normal operating hours.
The case will proceed in federal court, where judges will evaluate whether California’s voter registration maintenance practices comply with federal requirements. The outcome could affect procedures ahead of future elections, including the November general election.
