Jen Psaki Just Stepped In A Big Pile of Cow Dung With Eric Trump
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Former White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki, now a commentator for MSNOW, faced backlash after remarks concerning Eric Trump’s participation in President Donald Trump’s recent trip to China for a summit with President Xi Jinping. Psaki highlighted Eric Trump’s presence on Air Force One and raised questions about potential business implications. Eric Trump responded on social media, stating his intent to pursue legal action against Psaki and the network, describing the comments as “blatant lies.”
Eric Trump clarified that he has never served on the board of ALT5, has had no involvement in any merger discussions involving public entities he does not run or control, and maintains zero business interests in China. He stated that his role on the trip was solely as a son supporting his father during an important diplomatic engagement. He noted that during bilateral talks, he and his wife Lara Trump visited the Great Wall of China.
The China summit included a delegation of prominent U.S. business leaders, such as Tesla CEO Elon Musk and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, who joined as a last-minute addition. President Trump had indicated that his first request to Xi would focus on opening China to American businesses. The trip addressed trade, Taiwan, the situation in Iran, and artificial intelligence.
May you like
Psaki’s comments drew criticism from supporters of the Trump family, who viewed them as unfounded and part of a pattern of selective scrutiny. Eric Trump emphasized that a simple review of public records would have shown the inaccuracies. The network has not issued a public response to the threat of legal action. The exchange reflects broader tensions between the Trump administration and certain media figures over coverage of the president’s family and international travel.
No lawsuit has been filed as of the latest reports. The incident has renewed debate over media accountability and the standards applied to public figures in political coverage. Observers note that such controversies often intensify during high-profile diplomatic engagements and election cycles.
