Trump Makes Stunning Announcement About Pam Bondi - No One Saw This Coming

New York City – May 28, 2026
Trump Appoints Former Attorney General Pam Bondi to Presidential AI Advisory Council as She Recovers from Thyroid Cancer
New York City, New York — President Donald J. Trump has named former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi to a prominent position on the Presidential Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, where she will focus on the administration’s artificial intelligence strategy.
The appointment was confirmed following a social media post on Tuesday in which Bondi’s recovery from thyroid cancer was highlighted. According to the details shared, Bondi has undergone treatment and is recovering successfully from the highly curable form of cancer, which carries a 98 percent five-year survival rate.
Katie Miller, a former official in the first Trump administration and wife of senior adviser Stephen Miller, publicly praised Bondi’s resilience.
“[Pam] has a heart of gold,” she wrote on X.
Miller noted that Bondi approached her health battle with the same determination she has shown in public service. She also shared a screenshot of an Axios report confirming the health update and the new role.
Bondi served as Attorney General of Florida and later as a key ally during Trump’s first term. Her return to the administration comes at a time when the White House is accelerating efforts to maintain United States leadership in artificial intelligence, particularly in competition with China.
In the new position, Bondi will help coordinate discussions between the White House and leading technology executives serving on the panel, including Jensen Huang of NVIDIA, Mark Zuckerberg of Meta, and Larry Ellison of Oracle.
The council forms part of a broader initiative to steer AI development toward national security and economic competitiveness. Administration officials have repeatedly stated that the United States must avoid politically driven priorities that could hinder technological progress.
President Trump addressed the importance of AI dominance during remarks to reporters last week.
“We’re leading China, we’re leading everybody, and I don’t want to do anything that’s going to get in the way of that lead.”

Vice President JD Vance welcomed Bondi’s involvement in a statement provided to Axios.
“Pam has been an enormously valuable asset to the president’s team, and I’m thrilled for her and for all of us that she’s going to remain involved in confronting some of the most important issues the administration faces.”
The announcement has drawn attention both for Bondi’s health recovery and for the strategic placement of a longtime Trump ally at the center of the administration’s rapidly expanding AI agenda. Officials describe the council as a mechanism to ensure that American innovation remains at the forefront of global competition while prioritizing security and economic strength.
No additional medical details were released beyond the confirmation of successful treatment and ongoing recovery. Bondi’s supporters have described the development as a positive sign of her return to active public service.
The move aligns with the administration’s stated goal of assembling experienced voices to guide policy on emerging technologies. As the United States continues to invest heavily in AI infrastructure, the inclusion of Bondi is expected to strengthen coordination between government and the private sector.
6-3 RULING - Supreme Court Deals Brutal Blow to Hakeem Jeffries

Washington, D.C. - June 5, 2026
Supreme Court Allows Alabama to Proceed with New Congressional Map for 2026 Midterms
The U.S. Supreme Court issued an unsigned 6-3 order on Tuesday permitting Alabama to use a newly enacted congressional district map in the 2026 midterm elections. The decision lifts a lower court injunction and is expected to result in a congressional delegation of six Republicans and one Democrat.
The ruling came after Alabama had already held its congressional primary elections in May. Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey signed legislation authorizing special elections in August for affected districts, contingent on final court approval of the map.
The order relied in part on the Purcell principle, which generally discourages federal courts from altering election rules close to an election. The majority stated that the district court had improperly intervened in Alabama’s efforts to conduct its elections under maps selected by the state’s elected representatives. The court noted that while federal courts should avoid last-minute changes, states retain authority to determine whether such adjustments serve their interests.
Connection to Voting Rights Act Precedent
The decision follows a 6-3 ruling issued by the Supreme Court on April 29 regarding the Voting Rights Act. That earlier decision established that claims alleging racial discrimination in districting generally require plaintiffs to demonstrate a strong inference of intentional discrimination before proceeding with litigation.
The current order addresses ongoing redistricting litigation in Alabama. The new map is anticipated to alter the composition of the state’s seven-member congressional delegation. Democratic Representatives Shomari Figures of the 2nd District and Terri Sewell of the 7th District are currently the only Black members of Alabama’s House delegation. The new configuration could affect representation in one of those districts.
Dissenting Opinion
The three liberal justices dissented from the unsigned order. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that the majority’s approach had created turmoil and harm. She argued that the court was doubling down on prior decisions that she viewed as undermining protections under the Voting Rights Act.
Broader Redistricting Context
The Alabama case is one of several redistricting disputes before the Supreme Court involving states such as Louisiana, Texas, Virginia, and California. With control of the U.S. House expected to be closely contested, these cases have taken on added significance for both parties ahead of the November elections.
The Supreme Court’s recent interventions have already influenced district boundaries in multiple states. Additional litigation remains pending, and further developments could continue to shape the partisan balance of the House in the upcoming midterm cycle.
The Alabama order permits the state to move forward with its chosen map while legal proceedings on related matters continue. The full impact on the composition of Alabama’s congressional delegation will depend on the outcome of the August special elections and any subsequent legal challenges.
GHOST VOTERS' REVEALED — California Elections Rocked After Stunning Discovery

Sacramento, California - June 5, 2026
Lawsuit Filed Against California Secretary of State Alleging Failure to Remove Inactive Voter Registrations
A federal lawsuit has been filed against California Secretary of State Shirley Weber alleging that the state has failed to remove hundreds of thousands of inactive voter registrations from its rolls in violation of federal law. The complaint was brought by Orange County Supervisor Don Wagner, a Republican candidate for Secretary of State, and the American Independent Party of California, with assistance from Judicial Watch.
The lawsuit claims that California has not removed approximately 873,092 inactive voter registrations as required under the National Voter Registration Act. Federal law mandates that states remove certain registrations after voters fail to participate in multiple consecutive federal election cycles and do not respond to address verification notices.
Court filings state that more than 873,000 registrations remained on the rolls despite being inactive through at least three consecutive federal elections. The complaint further alleges that over 151,000 registrations remained active after four consecutive election cycles without voter participation.
California maintains more than 23 million registered voters, the largest voter registration system in the United States. Plaintiffs argue that the state’s practices violate requirements under the National Voter Registration Act for maintaining accurate voter lists.
Previous Actions and Current Allegations
In 2019, Judicial Watch reached a settlement with California and Los Angeles County that resulted in the removal of more than 1.2 million inactive voter registrations. The current lawsuit contends that similar issues persist across much of the state despite those prior efforts.
The complaint notes that 20 California counties removed 50 or fewer inactive registrations over a recent period, even as census data showed substantial population shifts and migration out of the state.
The lawsuit seeks a court order requiring California to implement a more aggressive program for removing registrations that no longer meet federal eligibility requirements. It also asks the court to prevent future violations of federal election law.
State Response and Context
California officials have maintained that the state’s election system includes multiple safeguards, including signature matching, voter identification checks where required, and criminal penalties for fraud. State representatives have stated that the system is secure and employs verification procedures designed to prevent illegal voting.
The lawsuit was filed amid ongoing scrutiny of California’s election processes. Recent incidents include damage to a mail ballot drop box that was vandalized and set on fire, as well as a report of an unsecured ballot center in the Bay Area discovered by a voter outside normal operating hours.
The case will proceed in federal court, where judges will evaluate whether California’s voter registration maintenance practices comply with federal requirements. The outcome could affect procedures ahead of future elections, including the November general election.