Spencer Pratt Bombshell Huge Update After Ballots Drop Overnight in LA Mayor Race
Los Angeles, California - June 7, 2026
Additional Ballots Continue to Be Counted in California Primaries as Spencer Pratt and Steve Hilton Maintain Leads
Vote counting continues in California’s June 2 primary elections, with additional mail-in ballots being processed in the days following Election Day. In the Los Angeles mayoral race, independent candidate Spencer Pratt remains in a strong position based on the most recent tallies, while in the gubernatorial primary, Republican Steve Hilton continues to lead the Democratic field.
As of Wednesday morning, with approximately 60 percent of the vote counted statewide in the gubernatorial primary, Hilton has received about 28 percent. Former Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra trails at roughly 25 percent, and progressive billionaire Tom Steyer holds third place with around 20 percent.
In the Los Angeles mayoral contest, Pratt has emerged as a leading contender alongside incumbent Democrat Karen Bass. The race has drawn significant attention due to Pratt’s campaign performance and ongoing questions about the pace of ballot processing in Los Angeles County.
Slow Counting Process Draws Scrutiny
Los Angeles County officials have reported that hundreds of thousands of ballots remain unprocessed more than four days after the election. Statewide, election administrators have indicated that final results in several races may not be known for additional weeks as mail-in ballots continue to arrive and be counted.
Prior to the election, public polling had shown Hilton and Pratt performing competitively in their respective races. As additional ballots have been processed since Election Day, some shifts in vote totals have been observed in certain contests.
California’s election procedures allow for extended periods of ballot counting after Election Day, a practice that has drawn criticism from candidates and observers who argue that results should be available more promptly. Other states that held primaries on the same day have completed or nearly completed their counts in a shorter timeframe.
Context of the Races
Pratt, a former reality television personality running as an independent, has positioned his campaign as an alternative to the current city leadership. Bass, the incumbent Democrat, did not reach the 51 percent threshold required to win outright in the primary and is expected to face Pratt in a November runoff if current trends hold.
In the gubernatorial race, Hilton has focused his campaign on policy issues and has maintained a lead in early returns despite a competitive Democratic field that includes Becerra and Steyer.
The continued processing of ballots has prompted renewed discussion about California’s election administration, including the timeline for results and the handling of mail-in ballots. Candidates and political observers have expressed differing views on whether the current system provides sufficient transparency and efficiency.
Los Angeles County has stated that it is working to process the remaining ballots as quickly as possible while maintaining required verification procedures. Additional updates on vote totals are expected in the coming days.
Top Democrat SHREDDED After Backing Graham Platner - His Career Is Over
Washington, D.C. - June 7, 2026
Rep. Ro Khanna Endorses Graham Platner for Maine Senate Despite Allegations of Past Misconduct
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) has publicly endorsed Graham Platner, the Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in Maine, even as Platner faces allegations of abusive behavior in past relationships. A New York Times report this week detailed claims from an ex-girlfriend alleging volatile and abusive conduct.
Platner has denied the allegations of physical abuse. In an interview with MSNBC’s Chris Hayes, he stated that the ex-girlfriend was lying about the abuse claims. He also criticized the media coverage as “journalistic malpractice” and accused the whistleblower of political motivation.
Platner has additionally addressed a Nazi-themed tattoo he received, stating that he did not know the design at the time it was applied. He described allegations that he knew the tattoo’s meaning as politically motivated.
Khanna’s Defense of Platner
Khanna acknowledged the New York Times report and described some of Platner’s past relationships as “toxic and volatile.” He stated that no one should make excuses for the past conduct or attack the women who came forward. Khanna added that Platner has “sought redemption,” “took accountability,” and has “worked to be a better man, a better human being.”
During a rally for Platner in Maine, Khanna attributed some of the candidate’s past difficulties to his service in the War on Terror, suggesting that the experience “broke” him and thousands of other veterans. He stated that sometimes the country itself feels “broken.”
Platner previously made public comments blaming women for being raped, which have also drawn criticism during the campaign.
Campaign Context
Platner is seeking the Democratic nomination for the open Senate seat in Maine. The race has drawn national attention as Democrats work to retain or expand their presence in the chamber. Khanna, often described in media reports as a progressive voice within the party, has positioned his support for Platner around themes of personal growth and accountability.
The allegations and Khanna’s response have generated discussion within Democratic circles about candidate vetting and standards for elected officials. Platner has maintained that he is committed to moving forward and representing Maine in the Senate.
The Democratic primary in Maine remains competitive, with vote counting and candidate positioning continuing in the weeks ahead of the general election.
Judge Delivers Ruling on Mail-In Ballots as Election is Too Close To Call
Washington, D.C. - June 7, 2026
Federal Judge Denies Immediate Injunction Against Trump Executive Order on Mail-In Voting
U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols ruled on May 28 that a request by Democrats for a preliminary injunction against President Donald Trump’s March 31 executive order on mail-in voting was premature. The judge concluded that federal agencies had not yet taken concrete steps to implement the order, so no immediate harm had been demonstrated.
Trump’s executive order directs federal agencies to compile a list of confirmed U.S. citizens and requires the U.S. Postal Service to deliver mail-in ballots only to voters appearing on approved state mail-in voting lists.
Democrats challenged the order in court, arguing that it exceeds presidential authority and could affect voting access for millions of Americans. Nichols did not issue a ruling on the legality of the executive order itself. He determined only that the plaintiffs had not shown sufficient grounds for immediate judicial intervention at this stage.
The decision leaves existing voting procedures unchanged for now. No alterations to how Americans currently cast ballots have taken effect as a result of the ruling.
Appeal and Ongoing Litigation
The Democratic Party has formally appealed the May 28 decision. Legal challenges to the executive order are proceeding on multiple fronts. A separate lawsuit filed in Massachusetts by several voting rights organizations seeks to block portions of the order. A federal judge in Boston is scheduled to hear arguments in that case.
On May 29, the U.S. Postal Service proposed a rule that would require states to provide lists of voters who receive mail-in ballots. The proposal is undergoing a 30-day public comment period before any final action.
The Massachusetts lawsuit was brought by groups including the League of Women Voters, the League of Women Voters of Massachusetts, the Association of Americans Resident Overseas, the U.S. Vote Foundation, OCA–Asian Pacific American Advocates, and Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. The plaintiffs are represented by organizations including the American Civil Liberties Union, the Brennan Center for Justice, the Legal Defense Fund, Asian Americans Advancing Justice, and LatinoJustice PRLDEF.
Plaintiffs’ attorneys argued that the Constitution reserves authority over election rules to the states and Congress, not the president. They expressed concern that the order could affect organizations assisting voters who rely on mail-in ballots, including overseas voters, military families, seniors, voters with disabilities, students, and rural residents.
Administration Position
The administration has defended the executive order as a measure to strengthen election security and improve verification processes. The Justice Department has not yet commented on the appeal of the May 28 ruling.
The executive order remains in effect while litigation continues. Federal courts are expected to play a significant role in determining the scope of presidential authority over election procedures in the coming months. Multiple lawsuits are advancing simultaneously, and additional rulings are anticipated before future federal elections.
