LOCK HER UP!' New York AG Letitia James Makes Outrageous Move POLI Against ICE Agents - She's Not Going To Get Away With This
WASHINGTON, D.C. — New York Attorney General Letitia James announced the launch of a new online portal on Thursday, inviting New Yorkers to submit photos and videos of Immigration and Customs Enforcement activity following a raid on Canal Street in New York City. The raid resulted in the arrest of nine individuals described as illegal aliens with criminal histories. James stated that the portal would allow her office to review and investigate any potential violations of law related to federal immigration enforcement in the state.
In a post on X, James wrote, “We’re launching a portal to review federal immigration enforcement in New York after yesterday’s ICE raid on Canal Street. New Yorkers who were present should submit videos or photos, and we will review and investigate any violations of the law.” She added that every New Yorker has the right to live without fear or intimidation and urged those who witnessed or documented ICE activity to share footage with her office. James emphasized that no one should be subject to unlawful questioning, detention, or intimidation.
The announcement came shortly after Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA) revealed plans by Democrats on the House Oversight Committee to launch what he described as a “master ICE tracker” to monitor the movements of federal immigration agents. Critics have characterized the combined efforts as potential tools for tracking law enforcement personnel. James did not address the fact that individuals in the country illegally are not considered New Yorkers in a legal sense under federal immigration law.
The Canal Street raid has sparked debate over federal enforcement tactics in sanctuary jurisdictions. Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) claimed during a press conference that ICE agents wrongly detained four U.S. citizens for nearly 24 hours without charges, describing the actions as “lawless terror.” Some local authorities in other cities have raised similar concerns about federal agents allegedly exceeding their authority. In San Francisco, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) suggested that state and local authorities may arrest federal agents if they violate California law, though legal experts note that the ability of states to prosecute federal officers acting within their authority remains limited.
Meanwhile, James is scheduled to appear in federal court in Virginia on Friday to face allegations of mortgage fraud. She was indicted earlier this month after prosecutors alleged she misrepresented a property in Norfolk as a second home to secure more favorable loan terms. The single-family home was purchased in August 2020 for roughly $137,000, with most of the purchase financed by a $109,600 loan that prohibited use as a rental or investment property. By claiming it as a second residence, James reportedly saved approximately $18,933 over the life of the loan. The case was referred to the Department of Justice by Federal Housing Finance Agency Director William Pulte.
May you like
James has previously been a vocal critic of federal immigration enforcement under the Trump administration. The current portal announcement has drawn criticism from Republicans who argue it could encourage interference with lawful federal operations. Supporters of the attorney general maintain that the portal is intended to protect residents and ensure accountability. No charges have been filed against any ICE agents related to the Canal Street raid, and federal officials have defended the operation as targeting individuals with criminal records.
The developments reflect ongoing tensions between state and federal authorities over immigration enforcement in sanctuary jurisdictions. Legal experts note that while states may investigate potential violations of state law, federal officers acting within the scope of their authority are generally protected under federal preemption principles. The mortgage fraud case against James adds another layer to the public debate surrounding her office’s actions and priorities. The situation continues to evolve as both the immigration portal and the federal indictment proceed through their respective processes.
