WOW! Capitol Police Chief During January 6, 2021, Riot Drops NEW Bombshell - Nancy Pelosi Should Be Indicted
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Former U.S. Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund stated in a recent interview that the FBI never informed him that hundreds of its agents had been deployed inside the crowds during the January 6, 2021, events at the Capitol. Sund made the remarks during an appearance on “The Great America Show” hosted by John Fawcett. The disclosure follows a report that the FBI had 274 plainclothes agents present that day, a figure higher than previously acknowledged in some public statements.
Sund said that on January 5, one day before the events, he met with representatives from major federal agencies and specifically asked whether any liaison would be assigned from agencies planning to have personnel on the ground. According to Sund, no agency disclosed such plans at the time. He noted that if agencies intended to deploy significant assets, standard protocol would typically involve placing a liaison in the command center to coordinate operations.
The comments have renewed discussion about coordination between federal agencies and the Capitol Police on January 6. Sund also referenced earlier testimony in which he stated that he never received an FBI report issued on January 5 warning of potential violence. He said the report was received by a Capitol Police officer assigned to the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force and passed to an official in the department’s Intelligence Division, but it did not reach his office.
The Justice Department’s Office of Inspector General had previously stated in a December 2024 report that it found no evidence of undercover FBI employees embedded in the crowds or at the Capitol on January 6. Then-FBI Director Christopher Wray testified before Congress in July 2023 that he did not believe undercover agents were present. The newly reported figure of 274 plainclothes agents has prompted questions about the scope of the FBI’s presence and the extent of information sharing with Capitol Police leadership.
Sund described the Capitol’s command structure as unusually bureaucratic, noting that a chief law enforcement officer for the House and a chief law enforcement officer for the Senate sat above him. He suggested this arrangement created obstacles to decisive action on January 6 and called for reforms to clarify authority in future situations. He emphasized that the chief of police should have greater operational control, particularly given his prior experience.
The developments have drawn reactions from lawmakers and commentators across the political spectrum. Some have called for further review of interagency communication and the accuracy of previous public statements regarding the FBI’s role. Others have noted that federal agencies routinely embed personnel at large public events for countersurveillance and intelligence purposes. A senior congressional source indicated that the number of FBI personnel at the Capitol on January 6 is not necessarily surprising in that context, though the figure is likely to generate additional scrutiny given past denials.
The interview also touched on former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Sund referenced Pelosi’s earlier statements that neither then-President Trump nor anyone else had requested National Guard support. He maintained that his requests for additional resources were not adequately addressed in the lead-up to the events. The Capitol Police Chief’s account has been cited in ongoing debates about responsibility and preparedness on January 6.
The January 6 events continue to be the subject of congressional oversight, legal proceedings, and public discussion. Multiple investigations have examined the security response, intelligence sharing, and decision-making processes among federal and congressional authorities. The newly reported details from Sund have added to the volume of information under review by various committees and interested parties.
As the conversation around January 6 evolves, questions remain about the full scope of federal agency involvement and the flow of information to Capitol Police leadership. Sund’s comments have prompted calls from some quarters for additional transparency and potential review of previous statements by federal officials. No formal new investigation has been announced in direct response to the interview, but the remarks are expected to feature in future oversight hearings and public commentary.
The broader context includes ongoing litigation and political debates related to January 6. Federal prosecutors have pursued cases against individuals involved in the events, while defense teams and some lawmakers have raised questions about the completeness of earlier investigative findings. The Capitol Police Chief’s account contributes to the continuing examination of operational decisions made that day.
May you like
Legal and security experts note that coordination between federal agencies and local or congressional police forces is a complex process governed by established protocols. Any gaps in communication can affect response times and situational awareness. The current discussion highlights the importance of clear chains of command and real-time information sharing in high-profile security situations.
The developments are being monitored by members of Congress on both sides of the aisle. Some have called for further briefings on the FBI’s presence and decision-making processes. Others have cautioned against drawing premature conclusions without additional context from federal agencies. The interview has generated significant media coverage and public interest as the nation continues to assess the events of January 6 more than five years later.
